Home/Nutritional Comparison

Direct Comparison Profile

Washington Navel Orange vs Apricot

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Washington Navel Orange and Apricot. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Nutritional Winner

Washington Navel Orange

Citrus sinensis

94Density Points

47 kcalCalories

0.9gProtein

2.4gDietary Fiber

Apricot

Prunus armeniaca

87Density Points

48 kcalCalories

1.4gProtein

2gDietary Fiber

Washington Navel Orange

Apricot

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Washington Navel Orange47 kcal vs 48 kcal (difference of 2%)

Higher protein density: Apricot0.9g vs 1.4g (Apricot has 36% more)

Higher fiber content: Washington Navel Orange2.4g vs 2g (Washington Navel Orange has 20% more)

Lower glycemic impact: ApricotGlycemic Index: 40 vs 34 (difference of 6 points)

Higher overall vitamin density: Washington Navel OrangeCumulative Daily Value percentage: 59% vs 11%

Higher overall mineral density: ApricotCumulative Daily Value percentage: 4% vs 7%

Apricot

Prunus armeniaca

Nutrient / Metric	Washington Navel Orange (100g)	Apricot (100g)
Calories	47 kcal	48 kcal
Protein	0.9g	1.4g
Fats	0.1g	0.1g
Carbohydrates	11.8g	11.1g
Dietary Fiber	2.4g	2g
GIGlycemic Index	40	34
Water Content	86.8%	86%

Nutritional Verdict

Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Washington Navel Orange is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.

Washington Navel Orange

The Washington Navel Orange is a sweet, seedless citrus fruit known for its vibrant color and juicy flesh. It is rich in vitamin C and provides a refreshing source of hydration.

•High in vitamin C, which supports immune function and skin health.

•Contains antioxidants that may reduce inflammation and lower the risk of chronic diseases.

Apricot

Apricots are small, orange fruits that are rich in vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants. They are known for their sweet flavor and are often consumed fresh or dried.

•Rich in antioxidants, apricots help combat oxidative stress and may reduce the risk of chronic diseases.

•High in dietary fiber, they support digestive health and can aid in maintaining a healthy weight.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Washington Navel Orange provides 47 calories per 100g, compared to 48 calories in Apricot. This makes Apricot more energy-dense, converting Washington Navel Orange into an ideal choice for caloric control.

In the protein matrix, Washington Navel Orange delivers 0.9g of protein per 100g, while Apricot records 1.4g. If looking to optimize muscle protein synthesis, Apricot is superior in this macronutrient.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Washington Navel Orange has 11.8g of carbs with an estimated GI of 40, whereas Apricot has 11.1g with a GI of 34. Apricot results in a more controlled, steady insulin response.

Regarding gut health, Washington Navel Orange features 2.4g of fiber per 100g, compared to 2g in Apricot. Consuming Washington Navel Orange significantly favors satiety and digestive transit.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Washington Navel Orange's profile is highly notable for: vitamin-c (53.2mg, 59% VDR) and potassium (181mg, 4% VDR).

Conversely, Apricot stands out especially in: vitamin-c (10mg, 11% VDR) and potassium (259mg, 7% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Washington Navel Orange: 94/100 vs Apricot: 87/100), we determine that Washington Navel Orange offers a superior overall nutrient density profile.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Washington Navel Orange due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Apricot because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Apricot is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Washington Navel Orange stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Washington Navel Orange and Apricot together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.