Rolled Quinoa vs Amaranth
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Rolled Quinoa and Amaranth. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.
Rolled Quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa
Amaranth
Amaranthus spp.
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Rolled Quinoa (100g) | Amaranth (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 368 kcal | 371 kcal |
| Protein | 14.1g | 13.6g |
| Fats | 6.1g | 7g |
| Carbohydrates | 64.2g | 65g |
| Dietary Fiber | 7g | 6.7g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 53 | 35 |
| Water Content | 12% | 8% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Rolled Quinoa is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Rolled Quinoa
Rolled quinoa is a nutritious grain that has been steamed and flattened, making it quick to cook and easy to digest. It retains the health benefits of whole quinoa while offering a versatile ingredient for various dishes.
Amaranth
Amaranth is a highly nutritious grain known for its high protein content and rich array of vitamins and minerals. It is gluten-free and offers a variety of health benefits, making it a popular choice among health-conscious individuals.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Rolled Quinoa provides 368 calories per 100g, compared to 371 calories in Amaranth. This makes Amaranth more energy-dense, converting Rolled Quinoa into an ideal choice for caloric control.
In the protein matrix, Rolled Quinoa delivers 14.1g of protein per 100g, while Amaranth records 13.6g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Rolled Quinoa offers a clear biochemical advantage.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Rolled Quinoa has 64.2g of carbs with an estimated GI of 53, whereas Amaranth has 65g with a GI of 35. Amaranth results in a more controlled, steady insulin response.
Regarding gut health, Rolled Quinoa features 7g of fiber per 100g, compared to 6.7g in Amaranth. Consuming Rolled Quinoa significantly favors satiety and digestive transit.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Rolled Quinoa's profile is highly notable for: copper (0.6mg, 67% VDR) and phosphorus (457mg, 65% VDR) and manganese (1.2mg, 60% VDR).
Conversely, Amaranth stands out especially in: magnesium (270mg, 68% VDR) and phosphorus (410mg, 58% VDR) and iron (7.6mg, 42% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
Rolled Quinoa contains highly valuable active principles: Saponins (Saponins have antioxidant properties and may help reduce cholesterol levels.).
Rolled Quinoa posee propiedades descritas como: Anti-inflammatory, Antioxidant.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Rolled Quinoa: 100/100 vs Amaranth: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Rolled Quinoa due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Rolled Quinoa because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Amaranth is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Amaranth stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.