Tricolor Royal Quinoa vs Amaranth Flour
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Tricolor Royal Quinoa and Amaranth Flour. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.
| Nutrient / Metric | Tricolor Royal Quinoa (100g) | Amaranth Flour (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 368 kcal | 371 kcal |
| Protein | 14.1g | 13.6g |
| Fats | 6.1g | 7g |
| Carbohydrates | 64.2g | 65g |
| Dietary Fiber | 7g | 7g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 53 | 35 |
| Water Content | 13% | 10% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Tricolor Royal Quinoa is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Tricolor Royal Quinoa
Tricolor Royal Quinoa is a nutrient-dense grain known for its high protein content and rich array of vitamins and minerals. It is gluten-free and offers a complete amino acid profile, making it an excellent choice for vegetarians and health-conscious individuals.
Amaranth Flour
Amaranth flour is a gluten-free flour made from the seeds of the amaranth plant, known for its high protein and nutrient content. It is rich in fiber, vitamins, and minerals, making it a nutritious alternative to traditional flours.

