Home/Nutritional Comparison
Back to Home
Direct Comparison Profile

Tricolor Royal Quinoa vs Amaranth

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Tricolor Royal Quinoa and Amaranth. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Nutrient / MetricTricolor Royal Quinoa (100g)Amaranth (100g)
Calories368 kcal 371 kcal
Protein14.1g 13.6g
Fats6.1g 7g
Carbohydrates64.2g 65g
Dietary Fiber7g 6.7g
GIGlycemic Index53 35
Water Content13% 8%

Nutritional Verdict

Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Tricolor Royal Quinoa is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.

Tricolor Royal Quinoa

Tricolor Royal Quinoa is a nutrient-dense grain known for its high protein content and rich array of vitamins and minerals. It is gluten-free and offers a complete amino acid profile, making it an excellent choice for vegetarians and health-conscious individuals.

Rich in protein, providing all nine essential amino acids, making it a complete protein source.
High in dietary fiber, which aids in digestion and helps maintain a healthy weight.

Amaranth

Amaranth is a highly nutritious grain known for its high protein content and rich array of vitamins and minerals. It is gluten-free and offers a variety of health benefits, making it a popular choice among health-conscious individuals.

Rich in protein and essential amino acids, amaranth supports muscle growth and repair.
Contains antioxidants that help combat oxidative stress and inflammation in the body.