Tricolor Royal Quinoa vs Amaranth
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Tricolor Royal Quinoa and Amaranth. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.
| Nutrient / Metric | Tricolor Royal Quinoa (100g) | Amaranth (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 368 kcal | 371 kcal |
| Protein | 14.1g | 13.6g |
| Fats | 6.1g | 7g |
| Carbohydrates | 64.2g | 65g |
| Dietary Fiber | 7g | 6.7g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 53 | 35 |
| Water Content | 13% | 8% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Tricolor Royal Quinoa is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Tricolor Royal Quinoa
Tricolor Royal Quinoa is a nutrient-dense grain known for its high protein content and rich array of vitamins and minerals. It is gluten-free and offers a complete amino acid profile, making it an excellent choice for vegetarians and health-conscious individuals.
Amaranth
Amaranth is a highly nutritious grain known for its high protein content and rich array of vitamins and minerals. It is gluten-free and offers a variety of health benefits, making it a popular choice among health-conscious individuals.

