Mung Bean vs Baby Lima Bean
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Mung Bean and Baby Lima Bean. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.
Mung Bean
Vigna radiata
Baby Lima Bean
Phaseolus lunatus
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Mung Bean (100g) | Baby Lima Bean (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 347 kcal | 113 kcal |
| Protein | 24g | 7.8g |
| Fats | 0.8g | 0.6g |
| Carbohydrates | 62.6g | 20.2g |
| Dietary Fiber | 16.3g | 7g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 25 | 32 |
| Water Content | 10% | 67% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Mung Bean is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Mung Bean
Mung beans are small, green legumes known for their high protein content and rich nutritional profile. They are commonly used in Asian cuisine and are celebrated for their health benefits.
Baby Lima Bean
Baby Lima Beans are small, flat legumes known for their creamy texture and buttery flavor. They are rich in protein, fiber, and essential nutrients, making them a nutritious addition to various dishes.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Mung Bean provides 347 calories per 100g, compared to 113 calories in Baby Lima Bean. This makes Mung Bean more energy-dense, whereas Baby Lima Bean stands out for its lower caloric footprint.
In the protein matrix, Mung Bean delivers 24g of protein per 100g, while Baby Lima Bean records 7.8g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Mung Bean offers a clear biochemical advantage.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Mung Bean has 62.6g of carbs with an estimated GI of 25, whereas Baby Lima Bean has 20.2g with a GI of 32. Mung Bean provides slower glucose absorption, ideal for preventing glucose spikes.
Regarding gut health, Mung Bean features 16.3g of fiber per 100g, compared to 7g in Baby Lima Bean. Consuming Mung Bean significantly favors satiety and digestive transit.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Mung Bean's profile is highly notable for: folate (130µg, 33% VDR) and potassium (1246mg, 26% VDR) and iron (2.7mg, 15% VDR).
Conversely, Baby Lima Bean stands out especially in: folate (130µg, 33% VDR) and potassium (508mg, 15% VDR) and magnesium (38mg, 10% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Mung Bean: 100/100 vs Baby Lima Bean: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Baby Lima Bean due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Mung Bean because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Mung Bean is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Baby Lima Bean stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.
More Recommended Comparisons
Discover nutritional differences and similarities with similar foods.
More Foods to Explore
Explore the full nutritional factsheet and recommended recipes for each.